Message 00684: Re: pacer
On Apr 2, 2009, at 7:53 AM, Aaron Swartz wrote:
schultze says the plugin finds out if they have a doc via a json api
which i could conceivably write a web ui for
I think there is a lot we can do, but (imho) we need a plan for
deflecting public angst over this. My current plan has two elements:
1. try and get courts to work with us so we clean at the source, they
take responsibility for propogating changes
2. we embed lawyer names/numbers and maybe even clerk name/numbers in
each doc to close the feedback loop
Simply making the data searchable (and walkable) from Google isn't
enough (yet) but I do think we can solve this problem this year.
Carl
- References:
- pacer
- From: Carl Malamud <xxxx@media.org>
- Re: pacer
- From: Aaron Swartz <xx@aaronsw.com>
- Re: pacer
- From: Carl Malamud <xxxx@media.org>
- Re: pacer
- From: Aaron Swartz <xx@aaronsw.com>