Subject: Re: nytimes

[Date Prev] [Date Next]

[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

[Date Index] [Thread Index]

Message 00587: Re: nytimes

To: Aaron Swartz <xx@aaronsw.com>
Subject: Re: nytimes
From: Carl Malamud <xxxx@media.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:38:16 -0800
In-reply-to: <dc21c7860902101637r7818c16i4a356fdbd99fabbb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <F89E788C-FA27-4CDF-901D-2C3E8492FE08@media.org> <dc21c7860902101606q7cebbcf8sa9e85f93aa21da00@mail.gmail.com> <03D34652-74AE-4A30-8B23-64AB49459B7D@media.org> <dc21c7860902101625ubea25fdyebc899675bac24ef@mail.gmail.com> <5551D510-61EF-4798-AE65-67688BA92C09@media.org> <dc21c7860902101637r7818c16i4a356fdbd99fabbb@mail.gmail.com>


On Feb 10, 2009, at 4:37 PM, Aaron Swartz wrote:

and if the schwartz gives up on getting the nyt piece out, i'm happy
to talk about alternate ways of going public

heh. that train has left the station ...

Follow-Ups:
- Re: nytimes
  - From: Aaron Swartz <xx@aaronsw.com>

References:
- Re: nytimes
  - From: Aaron Swartz <xx@aaronsw.com>
- Re: nytimes
  - From: Carl Malamud <xxxx@media.org>
- Re: nytimes
  - From: Aaron Swartz <xx@aaronsw.com>
- Re: nytimes
  - From: Carl Malamud <xxxx@media.org>
- Re: nytimes
  - From: Aaron Swartz <xx@aaronsw.com>

Prev by Date: Re: nytimes
Next by Date: Re: nytimes
Previous by thread: Re: nytimes
Next by thread: Re: nytimes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread