Message 00580: Re: nytimes
- To: Carl Malamud <xxxx@media.org>
- Subject: Re: nytimes
- From: Aaron Swartz <xx@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:06:25 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xshwl//GaEPpeRExydfsXoE7lvucoBAL8rbiCtsFWAI=; b=CGDahyyM2bfJyUZijEBTZINIXZnKyQh6ErhEzdk0l8h/5NmesyqqNggzmxuB1OGV+A GjPRImlU0VpSJ0MuAcpSHaOWz4A6jCoooTy4hWB9kXtbDTTGqEEyaqoQh/HuwnOa0ZpC 5eiyyQRBVOxbgCC5mD0/xE4bmSDDgw0UqUN6Q=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=RnIikoxbChqJ9oqcTcrnemsKtgguvvCK0zoC6DPl8V+l2BVAPGI1lvBPSbiURoSr9R ht6Tys8vG/d7TXjBD/VZmxkkalnRZAelCoY0PpEVvsUCpSBB7Du+29y+4nFgRGB72WZQ ugNeL5TjuZBYy8Y7IPLx0M/t/ki9rRyx3RfEA=
- In-reply-to: <F89E788C-FA27-4CDF-901D-2C3E8492FE08@media.org>
- References: <F89E788C-FA27-4CDF-901D-2C3E8492FE08@media.org>
- Sender: xxxxxxx@gmail.com
Did Schultze give his name to Schwartz?
I ask you not use my name until the Times piece is out. Any idea what
the hold up is? Pushing them on this doesn't seem too smart; saving
three days isn't worth the risk of losing the whole piece. This has
been going on for months; it isn't going to get stale.