[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Message 00583: Re: nytimes

> this isn't about saving 3 days, this is about making sure we're still a real
> ongoing news item.  if we do nothing, that is how you get cut.

If you think that might happen, you should talk to Schwartz about it
first. I'm sure he wants the article to see print too.

> PACER.  Part of my aim is to flush out the nytimes, but I also want to make
> sure we've got an ask on the table when the profile of this issue goes up.

I thought our ask was the rest of PACER.

> down) if we are just sitting around.  Editors don't like to hear that the
> story they're reading was really cool 2 weeks ago.  :))

This story is largely about things that happened months ago, not weeks ago.