Message 00358: Re: a couple of questions
- To: "Carl Malamud" <xxxx@media.org>
- Subject: Re: a couple of questions
- From: "Aaron Swartz" <xx@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:21:44 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=kOjnDOeRU5rBZ3mNI1ZkwyGniDiep2jyh3cVP2R0B9I=; b=OVindRwYnEka/kTOPr6w29MFeOciwVUOHLB8BJ6iaw0+n7pXs6Evd1S8f3zPE1cFAW e6eYwboXaUSoKzng7Dqw6VHLGP4Ldoev1lr+Nsf0yxDiAIxOd369tXTBlQUF4DcCx2Zv AYzu3kZyrZKKcS3oHZw5EgXWf0fGfNGRSqFOg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=YNwMc+LyR/iZUsaDHdToL6dny5JLWr0Xcm/cIGzpWdDisPP56YCAKeKTEJlRA0zaFy qgp+kYVcCuUcZ5Zw/ShuvPQvCKF8hXDJO4gGybll7vw1096qqiPCbTkgciXRb8g+BsDW 7rUIPI/CdgOsdlySIKWpzTmeYNFis2T+E5FMg=
- In-reply-to: <60A20D84-201A-46D8-AE5E-191AAE5D90A8@media.org>
- References: <59F7F8B8-624E-46AA-9560-8C473F69FDDA@media.org> <dc21c7860810191741h4a0684a5g7d99bd26c763c109@mail.gmail.com> <60A20D84-201A-46D8-AE5E-191AAE5D90A8@media.org>
- Sender: xxxxxxx@gmail.com
> If they are logging you in specifically, how did that interaction go?
I don't know.
> OK ... are you sticking with our .25 of the full thing estimate? I'll try
> to do a more sophisticated look at the percentages. I'd like to be fairly
> precise.
That's a very rough estimate; but it'd be hard to get a better one.
> New question ... do you still have a copy of the data? Does anybody else?
No. No.
> cheese out of soured milk. The important part for me is to see how we can
> turn the quarter pacer into the whole deal. In my letter to Judge
Definitely.
> Did you and Vixie ever close the loop?
No, he never wrote back.
> For MIT, do you know Jeff Schiller
> who runs the campus network?
No, sounds like someone I should meet though.
> For Harvard, do you know Scott Bradner who
> works for the university? I'm thinking one of them might be able to help
> you solve your 3480 problem ...
Yes, definitely -- hadn't thought of asking him. Will do.