Message 00355: a couple of questions
Hi -
Can you tell me more about how access to the pacer data was secured?
You said a cookie ... clear-text password transported in the cookie or
somehow encrypted? How did one get to that point? Was https involved
at any point?
Second, do you believe that for the districts you have, you are
complete? Or are these incomplete snapshots? How would one estimate
what portion of a district we have in that case?
I will be finished with my redaction death march sometime tomorrow.
I've personally redacted all the 32 districts, so I'll be able to
present the judicial conference with a dvd that lets them compare
clean to original copies, plus there is a ton of summary data I'll be
able to present. After I'm done with redaction, it will take me a few
days to prepare the summary tables, burn the DVDs, write the letters,
and fedex the whole mess out. After that is done, the data gets
released.
So, one final question ... do you want to do this with attribution or
do you want to be anonymous whistleblower? The former is potentially
dangerous to you, but that is totally your call. Let me know if you'd
like me to list the pros and cons of the two approaches. We're doing
some of the anonymous whistleblower routine in any case, as I'm
assuming your sacramento contact does not want to be identified.
Carl
P.S. I'm counting the total number of pages, but it is taking
*forever*. I will have final count in about a week, but what we have
so far is:
./summarize.sh pacer*txt ; date
Dist Files Pages "Value" Pages/Files
akd 54434 276841 $ 22147.28 5.09
almd 139471 930379 $ 74430.32 6.67
azd 27775 185876 $ 14870.08 6.69
gud 32889 150607 $ 12048.56 4.58
hid 47448 278832 $ 22306.56 5.88
ilcd 76860 571377 $ 45710.16 7.43
ilnd 71730 352181 $ 28174.48 4.91
nysd 157506 1386153 $ 110892.24 8.80
608113 4132246 $ 330579.68
The value number is one we're not going to publish and you and I
should not talk about it. If others want to do the math, that is
fine, but we should avoid that.