Re: pacer crawl

[Carl Malamud <xxxx@media.org>]

On Sep 12, 2008, at 7:23 AM, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> > ok, but let's not have that be a distraction from your day jobs?   
> > getting
> > watchdog up is by far more important.  pacer is not critical path  
> > for me ...
> > it is important, but it is not where the major push is right now.   
> > i'd
> > welcome the effort, but not if it is at the expense of your "real"  
> > work.
> It's taken up only a couple hours so far. What is critical path for
> you these days? The building codes stuff?
i'm most busy with building codes and administrative codes ... putting  
san francisco and la up soon.  just waiting to see if/when somebody  
gets upset.  eff is standing by.
pacer is also important, I just haven't had time to do anything nor  
has an opportunity presented itself to do anything.  but, if you grab  
a reasonable archive of a couple courts, we might be able to use that  
as a lever.
sorry Tim Stanley and John haven't answered your email ... they're  
both very good but both are a bit tough to pin down (day job keeps  
them busy).
Carl