Message 00827: Re: ithaka
- To: Aaron Swartz <xx@aaronsw.com>
- Subject: Re: ithaka
- From: Carl Malamud <xxxx@media.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 13:07:45 -0800
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTikkFTi7GR5ZzzgJaxv+M56fLVbV1_45NhzqTROC@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <AANLkTimrAdANR9xft+MgbXfHoH2wYiiOk4pQN8zkpyDw@mail.gmail.com> <7CEF8C4E-2062-448C-98D2-0CB87A470238@media.org> <AANLkTikkFTi7GR5ZzzgJaxv+M56fLVbV1_45NhzqTROC@mail.gmail.com>
there is a growing movement trying to rationalize "community access models"
which is different in their mind from "open access" because in community access
only club members get the resources. the result is a lot of content is taken
"off the market" because the providers think they have already made it public
in a manner of speaking. To me, groups like JSTOR suck the oxygen out of the
room for funding other efforts, deepen the digital divide.
I have similar issues with Hathi Trust, LLMC (the law library microform
consortium), CRL in Chicago, and a few others.
Brewster and I both girding up to go fight on this so-called digital public
library of america to make sure things like Hathi Trust are not considered
models of open.
My biggest issue right now is that efforts to digitize a GPO FDLP library keep
getting swept up in empire-building by groups like Hathi, making it hard to
assemble the coalition to make this happen because everybody trying to get
theirs. Pissing me off.
On Feb 19, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Aaron Swartz wrote:
> not exactly...i'm doing the same research
>
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Carl Malamud <xxxxxxx@media.org> wrote:
>> what, they your friends? :)
>>
>> On Feb 19, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Aaron Swartz wrote:
>>
>>> Why are you looking into Ithaka issues?
>>>
>>
>>
>