Message 00807: Re: more pacer data
- To: Aaron Swartz <xx@aaronsw.com>
- Subject: Re: more pacer data
- From: Carl Malamud <xxxx@media.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:56:49 -0800
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTimFtS9LZpXGSp=E+2MoU=bg52QpWXfTBN1HG=Hc@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <AANLkTi=qkN0CX+LdD1cP=xxbpkWhqOJswRBUAJL4dEzn@mail.gmail.com> <8D91C30D-641C-417C-BAE2-4ACC07BC210C@media.org> <AANLkTimFtS9LZpXGSp=E+2MoU=bg52QpWXfTBN1HG=Hc@mail.gmail.com>
Can't you just put the tarball someplace where I can grab it? It sounds useful,
but you have accounts all over the Internet ... if there is code as well for a
crawler, happy to take that as well.
On Dec 27, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Aaron Swartz wrote:
> if people like it i can probably keep it going; would prefer to hand
> it off to someone tho
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Carl Malamud <xxxxxxx@media.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Aaron Swartz wrote:
>>
>>> courtlistener looks like its just appeals courts, I have all federal
>>> districts going all the way back.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> is this one-time or an ongoing thing?
>