Subject: Re: more pacer data

[Date Prev] [Date Next]

[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

[Date Index] [Thread Index]

Message 00805: Re: more pacer data

To: Aaron Swartz <xx@aaronsw.com>
Subject: Re: more pacer data
From: Carl Malamud <xxxx@media.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:42:39 -0800
In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=qkN0CX+LdD1cP=xxbpkWhqOJswRBUAJL4dEzn@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=qkN0CX+LdD1cP=xxbpkWhqOJswRBUAJL4dEzn@mail.gmail.com>

On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> courtlistener looks like its just appeals courts, I have all federal 
> districts going all the way back.
> 
> 

is this one-time or an ongoing thing?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: more pacer data
  - From: Aaron Swartz <xx@aaronsw.com>

References:
- Re: more pacer data
  - From: Aaron Swartz <xx@aaronsw.com>

Prev by Date: Re: more pacer data
Next by Date: Re: more pacer data
Previous by thread: Re: more pacer data
Next by thread: Re: more pacer data
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread