Message 00802: Re: more pacer data
- To: Aaron Swartz <xx@aaronsw.com>
- Subject: Re: more pacer data
- From: Carl Malamud <xxxx@media.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:33:15 -0800
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTim=A8Tt=oALej9UH6-S5XqgLbOGVHGsU=EreoQL@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <AANLkTi=ovQ3ASKHWTETdPpV+qc5NxgN+iPyUmLgsNOWW@mail.gmail.com> <60F4D5EC-4D08-4652-B006-FD8E163AAE6D@media.org> <AANLkTim=A8Tt=oALej9UH6-S5XqgLbOGVHGsU=EreoQL@mail.gmail.com>
My board would shoot me if I give you an account. But, that data needs to be
available ... why not the Internet Archive? Can't you create a text item called
"PACER Feeds" and then just add a weekly or daily or whatever zip file to the
item? I think that's supported behavior for them.
Does this duplicate that courtlistener project out of Berkeley i-school?
You saw the announcement on radar.oreilly about the new national reporter
service we've started?
On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:27 AM, Aaron Swartz wrote:
> yeah, lots of people want it incl. them. need some place to stage it.
>
> On Dec 21, 2010 1:22 PM, "Carl Malamud" <xxxxxxx@media.org> wrote:
> > why don't you just hand it into the recap folks? they're the best place for
> > doing that ... they've got a full-time developer and are in the pacer
> > business.
> >
> > you talk to Steve?
> >
> > On Dec 21, 2010, at 10:13 AM, Aaron Swartz wrote:
> >
> >> I've obtained more PACER data downloaded thru a crawl done with PACER's
> >> permission. (It's of the written opinions, which they don't charge for
> >> anymore.) I need someplace to put it so that others like RECAP and
> >> OpenJurist can get at it. Would you be up for letting me rsync it to your
> >> server? (Again, PACER said it was OK as long as it was done nights and
> >> weekends, which it was. Even have some fancy time zone code.)
> >>
> >> If you're not up for going thru this again, I obviously understand but it
> >> does seem like the most convenient option.
> >>
> >