Re: assuming you saw ...

[Aaron Swartz <xx@aaronsw.com>]

amazing. nice work

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Carl Malamud <xxxxxxx@media.org> wrote:
> I started working with these folks middle of last year on the congressional
> record issues.  When our "troubles" began, I called the committee up and
> briefed staffers on what was happening just so we had somebody watching our
> back just in case.  When the NY Times did their piece, I wrote them back and
> asked if was evidence of willful non-compliance with the law and off they
> went ...
>
> Carl
>
> On Feb 27, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Aaron Swartz wrote:
>
>> amazing. what's your secret?
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Carl Malamud <xxxxxxx@media.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> better than that, Chairman Lieberman ... this is official committee
>>> business.  Note the phrase "requesting proper compliance" which is very
>>> strong government-speak.  :)  And, even better, it goes to the judicial
>>> conference, not the ao of the courts, so this has landed in the chief
>>> justice's lap.
>>>
>>> pretty nice, huh?
>>>
>>> On Feb 27, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Aaron Swartz wrote:
>>>
>>>> LIEBERMAN?!
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>