[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Message 00616: Re: assuming you saw ...

I started working with these folks middle of last year on the congressional record issues. When our "troubles" began, I called the committee up and briefed staffers on what was happening just so we had somebody watching our back just in case. When the NY Times did their piece, I wrote them back and asked if was evidence of willful non- compliance with the law and off they went ...


On Feb 27, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Aaron Swartz wrote:

amazing. what's your secret?

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Carl Malamud <xxxxxxx@media.org> wrote:
better than that, Chairman Lieberman ... this is official committee
business. Note the phrase "requesting proper compliance" which is very strong government-speak. :) And, even better, it goes to the judicial
conference, not the ao of the courts, so this has landed in the chief
justice's lap.

pretty nice, huh?

On Feb 27, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Aaron Swartz wrote: