Re: assuming you saw ...

[Carl Malamud <xxxx@media.org>]

I started working with these folks middle of last year on the  
congressional record issues.  When our "troubles" began, I called the  
committee up and briefed staffers on what was happening just so we had  
somebody watching our back just in case.  When the NY Times did their  
piece, I wrote them back and asked if was evidence of willful non- 
compliance with the law and off they went ...

Carl

On Feb 27, 2009, at 11:06 AM, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> amazing. what's your secret?
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Carl Malamud <xxxxxxx@media.org> wrote:
> > better than that, Chairman Lieberman ... this is official committee
> > business.  Note the phrase "requesting proper compliance" which is  
> > very
> > strong government-speak.  :)  And, even better, it goes to the  
> > judicial
> > conference, not the ao of the courts, so this has landed in the chief
> > justice's lap.
> >
> > pretty nice, huh?
> >
> > On Feb 27, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Aaron Swartz wrote:
> >
> > > LIEBERMAN?!