Re: full JITF report

[Carl Malamud <xxxx@media.org>]

Make sure if there are any written or oral guidelines issued by the  
libraries that you obey them.  If somebody asks what you are doing,  
tell them.  If they say stop, stop.  On the other hand, if nobody  
notices and nobody says anything and you're able to accumulate one or  
more district courts as archives, then we may have something very  
interesting.  But, be careful.

On Sep 11, 2008, at 8:59 PM, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> Cool. We found a couple of bugs with corner cases but I think
> everything's fixed now. Schultze is going to start deploying to
> libraries next week.
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Carl Malamud <xxxxxxx@media.org> wrote:
> > Yeah, that's a healthy gross margin.  I think I actually had that  
> > in one of
> > the early drafts, but it got cut at some point.  I was thinking of  
> > doing a
> > second stab at pacer propaganda.   Maybe that's a good lead.
> >
> > BTW, your sample files look fine ... my note had to do with  
> > postprocessing
> > and that shouldn't impact data gathering.
> >
> > On Sep 11, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Aaron Swartz wrote:
> >
> > > Me and Schultz were looking at
> > > http://pacer.resource.org/recycling.html and noticed that the actual
> > > report says that they made $60M from PACER that year and spent $11M
> > > operating it. This seems like numbers worth including.