Message 00218: Re: full JITF report
Yeah, that's a healthy gross margin. I think I actually had that in
one of the early drafts, but it got cut at some point. I was thinking
of doing a second stab at pacer propaganda. Maybe that's a good lead.
BTW, your sample files look fine ... my note had to do with
postprocessing and that shouldn't impact data gathering.
On Sep 11, 2008, at 5:29 PM, Aaron Swartz wrote:
Me and Schultz were looking at
http://pacer.resource.org/recycling.html and noticed that the actual
report says that they made $60M from PACER that year and spent $11M
operating it. This seems like numbers worth including.