[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Message 00181: Re: pacer


On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Carl Malamud <xxxxxxx@media.org> wrote:
> well, it's more symbolic than anything right now.  pacer is big (and dumb
> :).
> right now, nobody is actively draining pacer systematically.  Justia does
> some stuff, and there are some clearinghouses that pick and choose.
> my advice would be to pick one particular court and start building up an
> archive by systematically grabbing their opinions.
> On Sep 4, 2008, at 2:57 PM, Aaron Swartz wrote:
>> Do you have any guidelines for the thumb drive core? Any particular
>> things we should be sure to capture with the pacer docs?