Re: [open-gov] A Modest Suggestion In Regards To Official Portraits

[Aaron Swartz <xx@aaronsw.com>]

That would be perfect! TAL had a segment on that this week, actually.

On Jan 25, 2009 8:15 PM, "Carl Malamud" <carl@media.org> wrote:

self-portrait is what I'd do.  I can't believe people are falling for this troll bait.  Am debating whether I can get away with Alice saying:

Many issues are important to open government! Art, architecture, even animals! The Obama dog, for example, should not be dictated by executive proclamation, but should be chosen by the people. Surely, you must agree!?!

Did you see the other post from Silence where I suggested we put the judges on commission based on their PACER revenue?  Click on her profile.

Carl

On Jan 25, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Aaron Swartz wrote: > But you don't want to forfeit your portrait! >...