From: "Peter W. Martin" <peter-xxxxxxx@lawschool.cornell.edu>
Date: November 10, 2008 10:01:11 AM PST
To: xxxxxxx@uscourts.gov
Cc: "Winn, Peter (USAWAW)" <xxxxxxx@usdoj.gov>, Carl Malamud <xxxxxxx@media.org
>
Subject: Re: public.resource.org PACER audit
Michel -
I strongly concur in Peter Winn's suggestion that the Administrative
Office complete the audit begun by public.resource.org.
peter w. martin
jane m.g. foster professor of law
cornell university
607-255-4619
Winn, Peter (USAWAW) wrote:
Dear Michel:
As we discussed last week at the Privacy Conference, I am
forwarding to you the jump link to the audit recently performed of
some of the PACER records by the non-profit group,
public.resource.org.
The audit shows that there may be a serious lack of compliance with
recent rules enacted by the Judicial Conference relating to
privacy. Please note that the data showing privacy violations
cover both the period after the privacy rules of December 2007
became effective, as well as before that time, when local privacy
rules in most federal district courts contained the same
requirements.
These data show that our general expectation that the adversary
system would be able to insure compliance with the privacy rules,
has turned out to be incorrect.
I would suggest that the Administrative Office consider completing
the audit begun by public.resource.org to get a handle on this
problem. The results might then be communicated to Chief Judges
and Clerks in individual districts where problems were identified,
so appropriate action could be taken to address the rule violations.
I am copying on this email Mr. Carl Malamud, who worked on the
audit, and who I understand would be happy to answer any questions
about how his audit was conducted.
_http://public.resource.org/uscourts.gov/index.html_
Peter A. Winn
Assistant U.S. Attorney
700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220
Seattle, WA 98101-1271
Tel: (206) 553-4985