Message 00276: [open-gov] Re: footnote to Wonderlich quoting Jacobs
- To: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@googlegroups.com
- Subject: [open-gov] Re: footnote to Wonderlich quoting Jacobs
- From: "Aaron Swartz" <xx@aaronsw.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:58:44 -0400
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of xxxxxxx@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.157 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=xxxxxxx@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to :received:received:received-spf:authentication-results:received :dkim-signature:domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id :date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :references:reply-to:sender:precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-unsubscribe:x-beenthere-env :x-beenthere; bh=ZAAjAPaFtYYL2D4dsqTc7xufCWhCZIIp5ovyopGPqT4=; b=FLioBJg6lM1SwEwE5irxIc3WnWqm7YX8AId0U6CMj+SyIJZUGOUd6n8pKRvGfC/pr1 F4uvxBReWGHBG+2Io7fIqZfRPi8UNKm9N1HIlDpOhRfMPOX+gA+YJu6HCkjbMcbYm693 gM9dSdxDp8G09V/xPcVFgAVmTXR6l5QeMEaSI=
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=uxDyNmQew44eRH+6xdoRcd+LLVNW2wsL99qpiBJtzOs=; b=xmRxloai+yCxibzfdQWvcoeEZ890lOVL0ZoR/X00svXMLE8R/WBpU7YzVhh4DOWsC1 7cuek3GVDDFBLuENf/SGin60EXUFN0dU+/oP6YOweRMSCq/tSlC3gA5+PHhCZ3i82zmv 4fH8quNOpOYiIACzmx09Vnjn/BJYr/s6HnjXg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-sender:x-apparently-to:received-spf:authentication-results :dkim-signature:domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:to:subject :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:reply-to:sender :precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-unsubscribe:x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; b=G03L7N5qw846r4Bf66gp2ZMsG+88wC7bZ47ggg6fxujNOG89V62R1w8oEB/mxir2XI ZZmMwJCATll6sc/zOnbqhywnYqbwt7sUamrlox1iBjRupykxzQrq5XGkNgnIt2Fe8jlO NAUDHUYr5SXo94NbH2FpvONFizY1+mRUxgQ1Y=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=MdURlHbBcUmCLtnewmWZGIbMVA0ZF4uERUIRkAdNWYk7NFts2evcAarbRNQMLJSzLS i9/l2zSRnVZgbzHCv/nkq5PXCQW+Ecrcszwomdu64x12GY2bzA+RMUWBEZKzvHQhkm4m Y0HFaE64mhQPHoFDCjanDmAO8OITIg2PNb/tw=
- In-reply-to: <48D43994.9060405@emf.net>
- List-help: <mailto:open-government+help@googlegroups.com>
- List-id: <open-government.googlegroups.com>
- List-post: <mailto:open-government@googlegroups.com>
- List-unsubscribe: <http://googlegroups.com/group/open-government/subscribe>, <mailto:open-government+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
- Mailing-list: list xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@googlegroups.com; contact xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@googlegroups.com
- References: <4760A738.90408@emf.net> <e1bec487-6112-40e7-b586-31a4ee907044@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <b5bba8190712131157i78e4f4cbn91d15fc5efd7c930@mail.gmail.com> <4761B316.4020708@emf.net> <dc21c7860809191412v1fa395f4v2a9e723d2af2ad4@mail.gmail.com> <48D42C1B.3080905@emf.net> <dc21c7860809191458t5f7b4fa4oae924920da954d6e@mail.gmail.com> <48D43994.9060405@emf.net>
- Reply-to: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@googlegroups.com
- Sender: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@googlegroups.com
> There is a difference between "creating a list of patents" and
> making an easily consumed product.
I'm not sure it's as expensive as you seem to imply.
> Also, FOIA doesn't work like you think it does, I gather.
> You can be charged a fee for an answer to a FOIA request.
I've been filing a lot of FOIA requests lately. FOIA stipulates that
agencies can't charge more than the cost of search and reproduction
(with one unfortunate exception), which I'm happy to pay (it's rarely
more than $20). PTO is charging far, far more than that.
>> I think your notion that opening up data costs money and there's a
>> finite amount of money is simply mistaken.
>
> Who does the XML coding? Who runs the servers? Who gets 100
> little departments to change their 20-year-old procedures?
> It costs a lot of money!
It doesn't need to be in XML as far as I'm concerned; any database
dump would be fine. The government doesn't seem to have any problem
running servers, but if they did, p.r.o seems happy to host their
stuff for free. Departments already spend enormous amounts of
resources on FOIA teams and fighting FOIA backlogs and things like
that, and they haven't gone bankrupt yet.
>> But even if it was, the
>> government could use auction-style funding mechanisms to raise the
>> money once and then share it with all; this would be much more
>> economically efficient.
>
> Please say more. What kind of auction? Details?
>
> If your economic idea of auctions turns out to be good then
> *this* group (this list) could even take the initiative in discovering
> what legal obstacles there are to it and what needs to happen
> (e.g., congressional mandate? or just a directorial decision?
> and who needs to be lobbied? etc.)
I think just strengthening FOIA would be preferable.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open
Government" group.
To post to this group, send email to open-government@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
open-government+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/open-government?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---