Re: Scanned image from Lion

["Aaron Swartz" <xx@aaronsw.com>]

ok, it just says it's a license. corynne@eff said that usps is a
government agency, their stuff can't be copyrighted, so their licenses
are irrelevant. this wasn't and isn't formal legal advice, of course.

On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Carl Malamud <xxxxxxx@media.org> wrote:
> usps license agreement.  it wasn't a shrinkwrap, more like a stocking
> stuffer ... the actual data doesn't say anything, but this paper was in the
> stack of other stuff sent along on at least one of the products.  but, we
> should treat it like a shrink wrap unless a lawyer (e.g., eff) gives us the
> go-ahead to do otherwise.
>
> the basic questions: do we just have the facts and not the creative work?
>  did we agree not to do this?
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: <xxxxxxx@oreilly.com>
>> Date: September 16, 2008 12:37:14 PM PDT
>> To: xxxxxxx@media.org
>> Subject: Scanned image from Lion
>> Reply-To: <xxxxxxx@oreilly.com>
>>
>>
>> DEVICE NAME: Lion
>> DEVICE MODEL: im3511
>> LOCATION: C-2
>>
>> FILE FORMAT: PDF MMR(G4)
>> RESOLUTION: 300dpi x 300dpi
>>
>> Attached file is scanned image in PDF format.
>> This file can be read by Adobe Acrobat Reader.
>> The reader can be downloaded from the following URL:
>>
>>        http://www.adobe.com/
>>
>
>
>
>